I had no idea that my choice to wear bangs was so controversial.
I came across this article from the New York times. It was written almost three years ago, but I suspect that the opinions likely remain the same. There are so many things wrong with this article, I don't even know where to begin.
I have no doubt that there are women who get a particular haircut believing that it will somehow change their lives. I think most of us have had that feeling about either a haircut, a fashion accessory, or an article of clothing at some point in our lives.
However, this article makes such sweeping generalizations that I can't believe the Times printed it.
First of all, there is a statement that women with bangs over the age of 30 are making a cry for help and are trying somehow to recapture their youth.
Secondly, there are numerous statements that imply that women have bangs cut have unresolved childhood issues or are somehow emotionally unstable. The quoted hairdresser actually asks women who ask for bangs if they're on their period!
Thirdly, the article quotes a businesswoman as saying that no one with blunt bangs can be taken seriously in business.
Also, there are a lot of implications that women who wear bangs are high-maintenance women trying to be "cool".
While everyone is entitled to their own opinion, I was shocked that there were almost no arguments to refute the ones I mention.
I am so tired of being told by society and media how I "should" look or dress at my age. Is it so wrong to just want to wear hair or clothing in which I feel comfortable?
Myself, I have bangs because they are the most easiest style for me. My hair is so fine that when grown out, my hair won't stay out of my face without a clip or hairspray. For me, this is a no-maintenance, no-fuss style.
It's certainly not that I'm compensating for growing older. I don't think I'm anymore emotionally unstable than the next woman. This is just me. And I'm okay with that. When will the rest of the world let us just be okay with who we are?